Ice throne gave you 1 or 2 legendaries (a random zombie hero and on more I think, but I’m am not sure).
#Mtg standard meta sucks free
I have 3500 dust, it is not enought to craft any other decks.Īnd it is getting worse : adventures like gadgetzan gave you 5 free legendaries. Moreover, aggro decks are the only one affordable.
So I play aggro (best in the meta currently is token druid so I play this one). So I need to win 15 games a day+accomplish quest to have ~100gold per day. As a “free to play” player, I need a looooot of gold. The real problem is the “free to play” player’s options. I don’t think you have the right to complain about the meta being “unbalanced” since you’re making use of these unbalanced aspects.
#Mtg standard meta sucks how to
The majority of my deck tops above 5 crystals and I assure you, I win most of my games without being lucky becayse I practiced enough and learned how to beat these meta decks. In my case, a strong starting hand would be a Mountain Giant on turn 4. You can’t take the rng out of a card game. As for the “strong starting hand” point, that’s true with every card game. My matches almost always go past round 10 because I know how to stall against aggro. They’re beatable if you know the game and that’s how they should be! I climbed to rank 5 last season and from the looks of it I’ll be doing the same this season as well with Cube Warlock. Yes, it’s more or less an aggro-fest, but these decks are a far cry from what we used to have. I find this meta quite balanced, honestly. There are good control-style decks out there that will provide you with longer games and strategic plays. To complain about it is vanity since you’re not doing anything about it. May I assume since you’re playing “Face Hunter” that you’re not a fan of “long, strategic plays”? You see, you contradict yourself by complaining about an aggressive-oriented meta filled with value cards like Bonemare and Corridor Creeper while your own personal playstyle is aggressive-oriented tactics that rely on said cards. I really hope the next meta is better, because this is really starting to remind me of the early days of HS where you get pummeled from game-changing cards that are EASILY afforadble.(come on, Bonemare needs a reduction) Log in to Reply It’s hard to counter a high health card without spilling you crystals on spells and having none to at least put a low-crystal minion. Bonemare is a tide-turning card giving a massive change in the way the games are going and it’s a) real good b) cheap but when almost every deck is using Bonemare before Blizzard makes a nerf on it it’s a mess to deal with. It’s more quick kill than actual strategy. You can LITERALLY take out your opponent if you get a strong starting hand and control the board(at least for hunters gaining control over the playboard or going directly for a fast takedown is something easily achievable thanks to the agressive cards hunters have), but IF you dare have a lets say 5 crystal, 6 crystal and 8 crystal card and only one 1 or 2 mana crystal card it’s almost a guaranteed loss unless you get lucky and draw cards that you can actually play and hold on till the later round. As a Face/Midrange Hunter since the awful and disgusting pre-Gadgetzan(for some archetypes) and Gadgetzan days, the only thing I can say about this meta is that it’s extremely, EXTREMELY unbalanced in some aspects.Īs far as gametime for the current meta – you’d be lucky to go past the 5th round which is good to some extent if you wanna save yourself a spot in, but for someone who loves long and strategic plays more than overpowered powerspikes Early game i don’t like this.
0 kommentar(er)
